<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Is-Ought Dichotomy on Greg Gauthier</title><link>https://gmgauthier.com/tags/is-ought-dichotomy/</link><description>Recent content in Is-Ought Dichotomy on Greg Gauthier</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2024. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 22:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gmgauthier.com/tags/is-ought-dichotomy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Is-Ought: A Semantic Solution</title><link>https://gmgauthier.com/post/is-ought-a-semantic-solution/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 22:03:54 +0000</pubDate><category>Blog: [philosophy]</category><enclosure url="https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/blog/img/lassie-and-timmy.jpg" type="image/jpg"/><description><![CDATA[ 
                    
                    <p><img src="https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/blog/img/lassie-and-timmy.jpg"/></p>
                    <p>David Hume is famous for the &ldquo;is-ought&rdquo; problem, which comes from this famous passage, in his &ldquo;Treatise on Human Nature&rdquo;:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In every system of morality, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remarked, that the author proceeds for some time in the ordinary way of reasoning, and establishes the being of a God, or makes observations concerning human affairs; when of a sudden I am surprised to find, that instead of the usual copulations of propositions, is, and is not, I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not. This change is imperceptible; but is, however, of the last consequence. <strong>For as this ought, or ought not, expresses some new relation or affirmation, it is necessary that it should be observed and explained;</strong> and at the same time that a reason should be given, for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others, which are entirely different from it. (Treatise 3.1.1)</p>
                    ]]></description></item></channel></rss>